Peer Reviewers

Critical Dialectics follows a double-anonymous peer review process. Under this system, we keep the identities of both authors and reviewers confidential throughout the review process. Reviewers are not identified in published issues or on the journal website.

Why We Follow Double-Anonymous Review

• Independent Review: Anonymity allows reviewers to provide honest, objective, and constructive feedback without personal or professional pressure.
• Fair Evaluation: Keeping the identities of authors and reviewers confidential helps reduce potential conflicts of interest and supports a fair assessment of each submission.
• Academic Integrity: Manuscripts are evaluated on the quality, originality, relevance, and scholarly merit of the work rather than on the identity or affiliation of the author.
• Ethical Publishing: The journal follows established principles of ethical academic publishing, including the confidentiality and integrity of the peer review process.

Acknowledgement

Critical Dialectics sincerely appreciates the scholars who contribute their time and expertise as peer reviewers. Although their identities remain confidential, their careful evaluations and constructive feedback play an important role in maintaining the journal’s academic quality and integrity.